Comments on: Thinner Wired

By: Phil

Phil — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:36:42 +0000

Isn’t it weird? I got mine last week and was flipping through it and thought: “Something’s not right.” Sure enough, after a comparison, it is slightly teenier. I guess it saves a few trees/bucks. All mags seem to be going that way. Just be glad it’s not purse-sized “Teen Vogue”.

By: Benxamin

Benxamin — Fri, 03 Mar 2006 16:14:49 +0000

“Dear Editor(s):

Your magazine is an icon.

Squares, squares, squares.

To see the proportions get less square is heartbreaking.

Sincerely,
A Newsstand Junky”

Sadly, I also let my Fast Company subscription go, too. I guess that’s because I daily hit Seth Grodin’s blog.

By: matt

matt — Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:46:10 +0000

Not only is the current issue skinnier but lately they’ve taken that really great matte finish off of the cover. I absolutely loved the look and feel that gave the magazine, speaking in a very similar way about how hip/cool the magazine was that it didn’t need a super glossy cover.

Oh yeah, I’ve also let all my mac magazine subs languish as well, as blogs like TUAW are filling that void for me.

thanks for the heads up as I didn’t notice the skinnier size.